Report content

Email [email protected]. Reports are read by a person. You do not need an account to report something, and you may report anonymously, though we may be unable to follow up if you do.

You can also use the support form and choose “Content removal”. It needs no account; leave an email address if you want a reply.

• A link to the image or page, or enough detail to identify it.
• What is wrong with it — which of the categories below applies.
• If it depicts you: confirmation that it is you, and that you did not consent. Do not send identity documents unless we ask.
• How to reach you, if you want a response.

• Intimate images of a real person published without consent. Removed within 48 hours of a valid report, in line with the TAKE IT DOWN Act. This is our fastest route and we treat it as urgent.
• Any depiction of a minor. Removed immediately and reported to the appropriate authority. In the UK that is the Internet Watch Foundation; in the US, the NCMEC CyberTipline. If you have found such material anywhere, you can report it directly to them as well as to us.
• Content depicting an identifiable real person without their consent, whether or not it is intimate.
• Copyright infringement. Tell us what work is infringed and confirm you are the rights holder or authorised to act for them.
• Anything otherwise unlawful under the law of England and Wales.

• We acknowledge receipt within 3 working days.
• Reports of non-consensual intimate imagery are actioned within 48 hours of being validated, and we do not wait for the acknowledgement step to start.
• We tell you the outcome, unless you reported anonymously.
• We keep a record of each report and what was done about it.

If you disagree with the outcome, reply to the same address and say so; a second look is free. You always keep the right to complain to a regulator or go to court.

Every image here is generated from a text description by a machine learning model. Nothing is uploaded by users, and no photograph of any person is used as an input. If an image nonetheless resembles a real person, that is coincidence rather than derivation — which does not make it any less worth reporting, and we will remove it.